RefusedDecided 18 April 2018Carlow County Council

82 St Brigids Crescent, Bagenalstown, Co.Carlow

Planning application 1860
DecisionRefused
Decided18 April 2018
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Carlow County Council.
Planning permission is sought for the demolition of an existing single storey extension and shed to the rear of an existing single storey dwelling and the construction of a proposed dormer extension in its place (being a revision to previously granted 17/226). The proposed extension shall comprise of a replacement kitchen/living/dining area, additional 2 no. bedrooms, utility and entrance hall, replacement bathroom, revisions to internal layout of existing house, bedroom to first floor to rear, stairs to same and all associated works.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

No refusal reason is on record for this application yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 82 St Brigids Crescent, Bagenalstown, Co.Carlow?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →