GrantedDecided 19 January 2021Carlow County Council

Property formerly known as, The Manor House, Market Square

Planning application 20404
DecisionConditional grant
Decided19 January 2021
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents2

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Carlow County Council.
Demolition of existing beer garden structure and roof to rear of existing public house: change of use from existing public house and ancillary uses, at ground and first floor to 5 no. apartments, consisting of 4 no 1 bed units and 1 no 2 bed unit, along with internal modifications to accommodate new apartments, external modifications to existing north, south and west elevations to accommodate new recessed balconies, new windows and enlargement of existing window opes: all with associated site works.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Low OCR quality: verify against source documents

No refusal reason on record

No refusal reason is on record for this application yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Property formerly known as, The Manor House, Market Square?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →