GrantedDecided 05 April 2018Cavan County Council

Drumpeak, Kingscourt

Planning application 17329
DecisionConditional grant
Decided05 April 2018
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents4

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons16conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cavan County Council.
Construct two-storey extension onto existing two-storey detached dwelling, new vehicular entrance onto existing public roadway, upgrade existing waste water treatment system, percolation area and associated site works on previously granted Planning Ref No 07/2044. Significant further information and revised plans have been submitted

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

No refusal reason is on record for this application yet.

Conditions

  • 1Development to be carried out and completed in accordance with plans lodged on 25/07/2017 and amended on 13/03/2018.Compliance
  • 2Construction Methodology submitted on 13/03/2018 shall be fully complied with.Construction Management
  • 3External finishes of extension to match existing dwelling; material details (windows/doors) to be agreed in writing prior to commencement.Design Materials
  • 4Pay €3,430 (updated per WPI) to Planning Authority for public infrastructure/facilities per Cavan County Contributions Scheme.Development Contribution
  • 5Submit detailed site restoration and landscaping plan for rear/south-south-west including wetland restoration prior to commencement.Landscaping Boundary
  • 6Submit comprehensive Construction & Demolition Waste Management Plan (CDWMP) per DoE 2006 guidelines and EU Protocol prior to commencement.Construction Management
  • 7All construction wastes to be removed from site using appropriately authorised waste collection contractors only.Construction Management
  • 8Wetland area to rear/south-south-west not to be used for deposition of wastes and no works to damage remaining wetland.Environment Ecology
  • 9No works to impede drainage of adjoining lands and properties.Wastewater Drainage
  • 10Entrance set back 4m from roadside, max width 8m; gates set back 8m, max width 4m, height <1.2m; rural finishes; works concurrent with occupation.Traffic Access
  • 11Entrance area drainage piped under entrance, backfilled/graded at 5% gradient, Clause 804 base with 100mm bitumen macadam finish; surface water collected and discharged to watercourses.Traffic Access
  • 12No surface water from roofs or paved areas to flow onto adjoining road; must be collected by surface water drainage system.Wastewater Drainage

Planning a project near Drumpeak, Kingscourt?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Inside the decision file

Extracts from the council's own decision documents for this application — 22 pages of searchable text on file.

4 council documents — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief
Read the full decision filePro members can search and read every indexed page of this file with the AI research assistant — planner's reasoning, conditions, and precedent across 3 documents.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

4 council documents — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →