GrantedDecided 11 July 2017Clare County Council

Monmore Lower, Kilrush, Co Clare

Planning application 17399
DecisionConditional grant
Decided11 July 2017
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents6

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons6conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Clare County Council.
To demolish existing private shed and to renovate and extend existing dwelling house to include upgrading the existing wastewater treatment facilities and all associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

No refusal reason is on record for this application yet.

Conditions

  • 1Development must be carried out in accordance with drawings received 22 May 2017. Any points of detail requiring agreement must be agreed in writing with the Planning Authority.Compliance
  • 2All surface water must be collected and disposed of within the site. Discharge to adjoining properties, public roadway, wastewater system, percolation area, or future public sewer is prohibited.Wastewater Drainage
  • 3Existing dwelling and extension must be jointly occupied as a single residential unit. The extension cannot be sold, let, or used as a separate dwelling.Occupancy
  • 4External finishes of the proposed extension must match those of the existing dwelling unless otherwise indicated on submitted drawings.Design Materials
  • 5Extension must be used solely for purposes incidental to the residential use and enjoyment of the existing dwelling.Other
  • 6Wastewater treatment system and percolation area must be installed/maintained per submitted details and EPA Code of Practice (2009). Manufacturer certification required within 4 weeks. 3-year maintenance contract required. Soakaways must divert drainage away from the wastewater system.Wastewater Drainage

Planning a project near Monmore Lower, Kilrush, Co Clare?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Inside the decision file

Extracts from the council's own decision documents for this application — 17 pages of searchable text on file.
Chief Executives Order2 pages indexed
Order No: CLARE COUNTY COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT 2000 (AS AMENDED) $3 G42. File Reference Number: P717/399 Name of Applicant: Address: Pat Murphy & Trisha Rainsford c/o Diarmuid Keane & Associates First Floor Kilkee Community Centre Kilkee Co Clare Application Received: 22/05/2017 Nature of Application:...
Final Grant1 page indexed
CLARE COUNTY COUNCIL COMHAIRLE CONTAE AN CHLAIR Pat Murphy & Trisha Rainsford, c/o Diarmuid Keane & Associates, First Floor, Kilkee Community Centre, Kilkee, Co. Clare. i \C August, 2017 Re: Planning Ref No P17/399 A Chara, | attach herewith a Grant of Planning Permission subject to 6 No. Conditions in respect of the...
Final Grant2 pages indexed
CLARE COUNTY COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACTS 2000 (AS AMENDED) NOTIFICATION OF GRANT OF PERMISSION (SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS) UNDER SECTION 34 OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT 2000 (AS AMENDED) Comhairle Contae an Chlair Clare County Council To: Pat Murphy & Trisha Rainsford, c/o Diarmuid Keane & Associates,...
Read the full decision filePro members can search and read every indexed page of this file with the AI research assistant — planner's reasoning, conditions, and precedent across 4 documents.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →