RefusedDecided 14 February 2019Clare County Council

Ballyvorgal South, Sixmilebridge, Co. Clare

Planning application 181024
DecisionRefused
Decided14 February 2019
Application typeEXTENSION OF DURATION
Source documents4

Site

What is on file

4refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Clare County Council.
To Extend the Appropriate Period of Planning Permission P14-22 to construct a dwelling house

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Other

Planning Authority not satisfied that considerations of a commercial, economic or technical nature beyond the control of the applicant substantially militated against commencement of development.

Section 42(1)(a)(ii)(I) of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended)
the Planning Authority is not satisfied that there were considerations of commercial, economical or technical nature beyond the control of the applicant which substantially militated against the commencement of the development
Other

A previous extension of the appropriate period was already granted for the permissions on site (P14/22 and P14/133), precluding a second extension.

Section 42(4) of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended)
As an extension of the appropriate period has previously been permitted (Reference no.s P14/22 and P14/133), to the existing permissions on this site, the Planning Authority are therefore precluded from granting an extension of the appropriate period in this instance.
Procedure Invalid

Application form not fully completed and substantial information omitted.

Section 42(1)(b) and (c) of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended)
the application form has not been fully completed
Rural Housing Need

Current applicant is not the original applicant, making compliance with rural housing policy unassessable. Extension should have been sought by the original applicant.

Clare County Development Plan 2011-2017
the applicant is different and their compliance with the rural housing policy cannot be assessed in the current context. I consider that a proposal to extend the appropriate period should be made by the original applicant in this instance.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Ballyvorgal South, Sixmilebridge, Co. Clare?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Inside the decision file

Extracts from the council's own decision documents for this application — 5 pages of searchable text on file.
Chief Executives Order1 page indexed
CLARE COUNTY COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT 2000 (AS AMENDED) No. 6330 P SUBJECT: ORDER: Application by Mark Bennis to Extend the Appropriate Period of Planning Permission on site of P08/1442 and P11/368 to construct a dwelling house at Ballyvorgal South, Sixmilebridge, Co. Clare. P18/1024 Whereas by Chief...
Planners Report4 pages indexed
CLARE COUNTY COUNCIL PLANNING REPORT File Ref: P18/1024 Applicant: Mark Bennis Nature & Extent of to Extend the Appropriate Period of Planning Permission on Development site of PO8/1442 & P11/368 to construct a dwelling house Location At Ballyvorgal South Sixmilebridge, Co. Clare. Date Received: 12/12/2018 Decision...
Read the full decision filePro members can search and read every indexed page of this file with the AI research assistant — planner's reasoning, conditions, and precedent across 2 documents.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →