RefusedDecided 20 February 2019Clare County Council

Tullassa, Ennis, Co. Clare

Planning application 181043
DecisionRefused
Decided20 February 2019
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents4

Site

What is on file

2refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Clare County Council.
For development which will consist of; a) Amendment of Condition No. 2 of Planning Reference P13-560 to provide for the permanent use of the existing facility for clay shooting. b) Change of Use of the site to provide for the additional recreational use including Archery, Golf Drive,.17,.22 and Air Rifles ( using low sub-sonic bullets and modifiers ) and compact sport clay shooting. c) To construct an embankment as noise reduction measure, d) Construct an additional hut to facilitate compact sporting clay shooting, e) Change of hours of operation, f) Modify the construction of one of the huts as noise reduction and safety measure from what was previously granted under planning reference P13-560 and P16-1020 including all ancillary site services and works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
ABP-303973-19Submitted 19 March 2019 / decided 04 September 2019
Status not recordedREFUSED
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Residential Amenity

Permanent clay shooting and additional recreational uses would cause unacceptable noise nuisance and disturbance to nearby residents, seriously injuring residential amenities.

Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended) - proper planning and sustainable development
would result in unacceptable levels of noise nuisance and disturbance for residents in the vicinity of the site. The proposed development would therefore seriously injure the residential amenities of the area
Traffic Sightlines

Intensification of use would endanger public safety due to additional traffic on narrow local roads with poor alignment and restricted forward visibility.

Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended) - proper planning and sustainable development
The site is accessed by a network of narrow local roads with poor vertical and horizontal alignment and with sections with restricted forward visibility... would endanger public safety by reason of traffic hazard because of the additional traffic movements which would be generated.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Tullassa, Ennis, Co. Clare?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Inside the decision file

Extracts from the council's own decision documents for this application — 48 pages of searchable text on file.
Chief Executives Order2 pages indexed
CLARE COUNTY COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT 2000 (AS AMENDED) “£63 UG Order No: Reference Number: P18/1043 Name of Applicant: Michael Haren Address: c/o O'Gorman Architectural Services 4 Showgrounds View Ennis Co. Clare V95 W27H Application Received: 18/12/2018 Additional Information Received: 30/01/2019 Nature...
Planners Report12 pages indexed
C la re Pl a nn ng Au th or ity -I ns pe ct io n Pu rp os es O nl y!
Planners Report34 pages indexed
C la re Pl a nn ng Au th or ity -I ns pe ct io n Pu rp os es O nl y!
Read the full decision filePro members can search and read every indexed page of this file with the AI research assistant — planner's reasoning, conditions, and precedent across 3 documents.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →