RefusedDecided 07 January 2021Clare County Council

Brickhill East, Cratloe, Co. Clare

Planning application 20849
DecisionRefused
Decided07 January 2021
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents4

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Clare County Council.
To RETAIN as constructed, domestic garage/store which varies from granted permission P18-604 plus all ancillary site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
ABP-309358-21Submitted 03 February 2021 / decided 19 July 2021
Status not recordedREFUSED
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

No refusal reason is on record for this application yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Brickhill East, Cratloe, Co. Clare?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Inside the decision file

Extracts from the council's own decision documents for this application — 16 pages of searchable text on file.
Chief Executives Order1 page indexed
CLARE COUNTY COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT 2000 (AS AMENDED) Order No: A690 43 Reference Number: P20/849 Name of Applicant: Anthony & Valerie MciInerney Address: c/o Gerry Malone Crossbeg Cross Kilrush Co. Clare V15 VA07 Application Received: 12/11/2020 Nature of Application: Permission to RETAIN as...
Planners Report12 pages indexed
C la re Pl a nn ng Au th or ity -I ns pe ct io n Pu rp os es O nl y!
Planners Report3 pages indexed
UZ0e/aLILY] a es 2 -* Bs oo «= Fe © he me * ee Cre EE am it : “ ery i> ~ = a CONF vin Hat) ~~ OESt -bE- ff souou Pus 10 vojoae 99g a F RVR) ey HSB “SRR nH “ea Preriy pauls YORE UES oO} BSNyas Ac re eee ee seu Aiuouine Buiuueld ayy comets UiuUBId ey) Ad paiepisuco ma a eam 6 jo pound én Ui ae ene JO Ayyouine ey Aq...
Read the full decision filePro members can search and read every indexed page of this file with the AI research assistant — planner's reasoning, conditions, and precedent across 3 documents.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →