GrantedDecided 04 February 2005Cork County Council

Foxhole Youghal

Planning application 04/7531
DecisionConditional grant
Decided04 February 2005
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
Waste recovery/transfer and sludge drying facility consisting of a waste recovery and transfer building, administration building and carpark, transformer/plant building and standby generator, boiler and woodchip storage building, sludge reception building, sludge drying building, waste water treatment plant including balancing tank, fire water storage tank, storm water retention tank, 1 no. weighbridge, 1 no. wheelwash, oil storage and bund walls, waste quarantine area, dried sludge discharge area, mobile dewatering plant, mobile fire fighting plant, hard standings, all boundary fencing and walls, all associated site works and ancillaries

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Foxhole Youghal?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →