GrantedDecided 30 April 2008Cork County Council

Cluain Ard Newtown Ringmeen Cobh

Planning application 08/5240
DecisionConditional grant
Decided30 April 2008
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
Revisions to 86 no. dwellinghouses permitted under pl. reg. no.04/6297 to include replacement of 30 no. type C dwellings and 2 no. type F1 dwellings with 32 no type C3 dwellings, replacement of 54 no. type F2 type dwellings (91.6sq.m) with 54 no. type F2 type dwellings (100.2sq.m), repositioning of units to accommodate new house plans and associated revisions to site development and landscaping works to No's 2-3, Hazel Walk, No's 20-27 Chestnut Drive, No's 2-9 and 12-17 Beechwood Grove, No's 1-20 Maple Close, no's 1-10, 12-17, 21-24, 28-33, 35-37, 39-45 and 49-54 Cherry Orchard

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Cluain Ard Newtown Ringmeen Cobh?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →