GrantedDecided 18 September 2008Cork County Council

Broomfield Village Broomfield East Midleton

Planning application 08/8103
DecisionConditional grant
Decided18 September 2008
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
Revisions to development previously permitted under Pl. Reg No's 00/5498, 05/6413, 06/7671 & 08/4484 (1-43 Wheatley Way, 1-25, Wheatley Hills & 1-56, Wheatley Heights) to include replacement of 124 no. dwelling units with 137 no. dwelling units comprising of 13 no. four bed detached dwellings, 64 no. optional three or four bed semi-detached dwellings, 14 no. three bed split-level semi-detached dwellings, 20 no. optional three or four bed split level semi-detached dwellings and 26 no. three bed terraced units and associated site development and landscaping works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Broomfield Village Broomfield East Midleton?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →