GrantedDecided 19 September 2008Cork County Council

Drominare Gortavaroon Farranastig Whitechurch

Planning application 08/8129
DecisionConditional grant
Decided19 September 2008
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
Retention and completion of alterations to 7 no. dwellinghouses to include revised plan and elevations to North site No.20 (House Type B1), South site No.6 (House Type E5), South site No.20 (House Type E6), South site No.24 (House Type E5), South site No.88 (House Type E5) and revisions to south site layout to include minor alterations to road alighment, replacement of semi-detached house type F4 on Site No. 101 with semi-detached house type E2, replacement of semi-detached type E1 on Site No.102 with semi-detached house type F1 and associated development works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Drominare Gortavaroon Farranastig Whitechurch?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →