RefusedDecided 27 April 2010Cork County Council

Clashmorgan Mourneabbey Mallow

Planning application 10/4512
DecisionRefused
Decided27 April 2010
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
Retention of alterations to elevation to include re-roofing of existing shop, store, warehouse and office. Permission for change of use from shop, store, warehouse and office to a safety training centre, construction of a first floor extension to include additional offices and canteen, construction of a nine hole pitch and putt course to include ornamental lake, coffee bar, fire-fighting training tower for commercial use and fire-fighting tower for domestic use, ornamental fountain next to main entrance and installation of an effluent treatment unit and surface water interceptor

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Clashmorgan Mourneabbey Mallow?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →