GrantedDecided 30 June 2010Cork County Council

No.7 Carrigdhoun Carrigaline Middle Carrigaline

Planning application 10/5095
Get site risk briefNearby records
DecisionConditional grant
Decided30 June 2010
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

Setting
Unknown
Site area
Not recorded
Floor area
Not recorded
Units
Not recorded

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
Retention and completion of porch and boundary walls to front of dwelling, replacement of door with window on north elevation, extension and garden shed to rear and associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.
Application ref
10/5095
Received
07 May 2010
Decided
30 June 2010
FI requested
No
Authority
Cork County Council
Application type
PERMISSION
Outcome
Conditional grant
Source status
Documents indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near No.7 Carrigdhoun Carrigaline Middle Carrigaline?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.
Get my site risk brief

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →