GrantedDecided 29 November 2010Cork County Council

Corkbeg Whitegate

Planning application 10/8114
DecisionConditional grant
Decided29 November 2010
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
Construction of a new Amine and Sulphuric Acid Plant consisting of a 28 metre high (including pipework) above ground level open steel structure incorporating an exhaust stack of 40 metres height above ground level and a stand-alone aluminium clad steel tower, T-1003, 30metres in height (including pipework) above ground level. The proposed development is for the purposes of an activity which requires an integrated pollution prevention and control licence. The proposed development relates to modifications to an establishment within the meaning of Part 11 of thses Regulations (Major Accident Directive)

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Corkbeg Whitegate?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →