GrantedDecided 17 May 2011Cork County Council

Clonakilty Shopping Centre Facksbridge Clonakilty Co. Cork

Planning application 11/50003
DecisionConditional grant
Decided17 May 2011
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
For part demolition and part reconstruction of the former supermarket and consequent alterations to the south and the part west and part east facade to form a clear storey entrance area containing a stairway, entrance doors and display windows, recladding of the remainder of the west facade and provision of a link bridge to the first floor car park lobby of the existing supermarket to the west and re-use of the building for non supermarket comparision retail purposes, including all associated site development works and signage

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Clonakilty Shopping Centre Facksbridge Clonakilty Co. Cork?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →