GrantedDecided 29 July 2011Cork County Council

Mansfield's-Land Rathvallikeen Kinsale Co. Cork

Planning application 11/5224
DecisionConditional grant
Decided29 July 2011
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
Change of use of part of existing store to retail shop, modify existing shop/store to provide managers office, entrance lobby extension to rear, chemical store and toilet; construct upper floor over existing offices for comms room and storage; partial demolition and construction of ground floor extension to front of building and elevation alterations including the replacement of existing wall sheeting with new facade; change of use of part of existing parking area to external garden centre and of existing storage yard to parking area and install new site signage

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Mansfield's-Land Rathvallikeen Kinsale Co. Cork?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →