GrantedDecided 13 February 2012Cork County Council

Esk North, Esk South Derrygowna, Monanveel Glanminnane Millstreet/Mallow

Planning application 11/5276
DecisionConditional grant
Decided13 February 2012
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
Windfarm to consist of [a] the provision of a total of 12 no. wind turbines with a maximum ground to top blade tip height of up to 126 metres, [b] upgrading of existing and provision of new internal access roads, [c] provision of a wind anemometry mast (85 metres in height), [d] 2 no. borrow pits, [e] an electricity sub-station with control room (as previously approved under Planning Reg. No. 11/4242), and [f] associated equipment and all ancilary site and facilitating works to existing road junctions.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Esk North, Esk South Derrygowna, Monanveel Glanminnane Millstreet/Mallow?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →