GrantedDecided 18 December 2012Cork County Council

Macroom Community Leisure Centre Castle Ground Macroom Co. Cork

Planning application 12/54010
DecisionConditional grant
Decided18 December 2012
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
Macroom Sports & Leisure Complex Mgt, Company Ltd wish to apply for permission for proposed 2 storey extension accommodating a gym and fitness studio to the north west of existing building and a single storey extension to the south east accommodation an office, store and universal access W.C elevational changes, internal modifications and refurbishment are also proposed together with a proposed multi-sport artificial grass all weather pitch to the west of existing building with flood lighting and associated site development

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Macroom Community Leisure Centre Castle Ground Macroom Co. Cork?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →