GrantedDecided 26 October 2012Cork County Council

Preghane Kinsale Co. Cork

Planning application 12/5890
DecisionConditional grant
Decided26 October 2012
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
Permission for retention of alterations and amendments to dwellinghouse to include the following (a) the incorporation of existing attached boat house into existing dwellinghouse (b) consequent elevational modifications including changes to the fenestration openings and fenestration pattern to the front elevation and side elevation (c) change of roof finish from felt to tile effect metal sheeting (d) the addition of stone cladding to parts of the front elevation and parts of the side elevations of the house (e) the addition of canopy at rear door (f) all ancillary site development works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Preghane Kinsale Co. Cork?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →