GrantedDecided 17 June 2014Cork County Council

16 Deerpark Castlepark Mallow Co. Cork.

Planning application 14/55011
DecisionConditional grant
Decided17 June 2014
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
Permission for construction of single storey and two storey exensions at the side and rear of the existing dwelling respectively, replacement of the windows of existing dwelling with energy effiicent new windows, minor alterations of the existing structures associated with the proposed extensions and corresponding ground works. The extensions include space for kitchen, living room, study on the proposed ground floor and a bedroom on the proposed 1st floor, the ground works relates to the constructive works, re-organisation of the services on site and landscaping

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 16 Deerpark Castlepark Mallow Co. Cork.?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →