GrantedDecided 22 September 2016Cork County Council

Gortduff Goleen Co Cork

Planning application 16/481
DecisionConditional grant
Decided22 September 2016
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
Retention of; (a) Alterations and extension to a dwellinghouse for ancillary and short-term/holiday letting use, (b) Change of use and alterations of an outbuilding to a disabled bedroom, sitting area and shower room (c) Construction of a connecting lobby in lieu of porch (d) installation of a septic tank sewage system and all associated site and landscape works, and Permission is sought for (e) Demolition of existing box dormer window (f) Alterations to dwellinghouse and construction of a first floor extension (g) upgrading of the existing sewage treatment percolation area to a polishing filter and all associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Gortduff Goleen Co Cork?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →