GrantedDecided 02 August 2017Cork County Council

Meelaherragh Kanturk Co. Cork

Planning application 17/4281
DecisionConditional grant
Decided02 August 2017
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
Part Retention works, part remediation works and part completion works of previously commenced unauthorised works for the provision of a horse riding track and associated stone extraction works. The development includes Retention and completion of parts of horse track; new parts of horse track; infilling areas of previous quarrying/rock extraction; stabilistation of area of river bank erosion; infilling of two silt trap areas; adoption of a silt trap area to provide wetland habitat pond; removal of embankment adjacent to river; associated site development works. All on a site of approx 3.89 Hectares.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Meelaherragh Kanturk Co. Cork?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →