GrantedDecided 10 April 2017Cork County Council

13 Wolfe Tone Street Kilgarvan Cobh Co.Cork

Planning application 17/4294
DecisionConditional
Decided10 April 2017
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
A) Retention of existing; i) attic conversion- non habitable (19.2m2), ii) dormer development spanning width of rear roof with a window to rear (north) elevation, iii) velux rooflight on front roof (south elevation) and iv) single storey ground floor extension (2.4m2) at the rear (north) elevation of existing dwellinghouse. B) Permission to construct i) dormer development spanning width of front roof with window on front (south) elevation of existing dwellinghouse and ii) first floor extension over the existing GF rear annex (being retained) to the rear (north) elevation of existing dwellinghouse

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 13 Wolfe Tone Street Kilgarvan Cobh Co.Cork?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →