GrantedDecided 05 January 2018Cork County Council

Mount Eaton Stores, Carrignafoy Cobh Co.Cork

Planning application 17/6259
DecisionConditional grant
Decided05 January 2018
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
1. Change of use of former ground floor retail unit to 2 No. flats and 1 No. retail unit. 2. Alterations and change of use of 1st floor retail area for use as extension to 3 No. existing flats. 3. 2 Storey extension to East(rear) side of building to accommodate stairs access to first floor flat and extension to proposed ground floor flat. 4. Elevational modification to ground and first floor. 5. Site works to include modification to external footpaths, parking area, external stairs to northern elevation for access to front first floor flat.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Mount Eaton Stores, Carrignafoy Cobh Co.Cork?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →