GrantedDecided 10 July 2018Cork County Council

Existing Dairygold Co-Op Store Rearour and Barrettshill Ballinhassig Co. Cork

Planning application 18/4047
DecisionConditional grant
Decided10 July 2018
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
(1) Demolition of existing disused grain storage building, (2) Demolition of existing retail store, (3) Demolition of existing external concrete grain store silos, (4) Demolition of existing weighbridge and weighbridge control kiosk, (5) construction of new agri & retail branch store comprising retail shop, store, ancillary offices, staff facilities, canopy and facade signage, (6) New concrete yards areas, customer car parking, boundary treatments and all associated site development and drainage works.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Existing Dairygold Co-Op Store Rearour and Barrettshill Ballinhassig Co. Cork?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →