GrantedDecided 22 August 2019Cork County Council

Bishop's Island Watergrasshill Co. Cork

Planning application 19/4921
DecisionConditional grant
Decided22 August 2019
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
The proposed development consists of the construction of 29 no. residential units consisting of 2 no. 5 bed detached dwellings, 7 no. 4 bed detached and semi-detached dwellings and 20 no. 3 bed semi-detached dwellings, vehicular access is to be provided onto the R639 to the south of the site via ‘The Orchard’ estate currently under construction and permitted by TP 18/4162. Permission is sought for the development outlined including, but not limited to landscaping, boundary treatments, play areas, car parking, drainage and all ancillary site development works.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Bishop's Island Watergrasshill Co. Cork?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →