GrantedDecided 08 April 2022Cork County Council

Eastwood Raheens Carrigaline Co.Cork

Planning application 22/4290
DecisionConditional grant
Decided08 April 2022
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
Permission for modifications to our existing dwelling house, namely: i) construction of a single storey extension to the side (east) elevation, ii) construction of a single storey extension to the rear (north) elevation, iii) insert 2 no. velux roof lights on the existing front roof, iv) revisions to some of the existing opes - their size and locations on the front and rear elevation of existing dwelling, so as to suit new internal room layouts, v) removal of both chimney stacks and vi) insert a canopy roof overhang on front (south) elevation over new external front slider door ope.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Eastwood Raheens Carrigaline Co.Cork?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →