RefusedDecided 08 June 2023Cork County Council

Moontide, Lee Carrow Rockenham, Pembroke Passage West Co.Cork

Planning application 22/6064
DecisionRefused
Decided08 June 2023
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
Construction of a new dwelling house, the proposed house site is to be sub-divided from the plot of the existing bungalow with proposed works including the removal of existing septic tank drainage system serving existing bungalow, replacing with pumped individual connection to public sewer and alterations of existing gateway to provide access driveway for new dwelling together with boundary fencing, underground services and associated site works including the pumping individual connection to public sewer for proposed house.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Moontide, Lee Carrow Rockenham, Pembroke Passage West Co.Cork?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →