RefusedDecided 01 April 2022Cork County Council

Dun na Sead Castle Baltimore Co. Cork

Planning application 22/69
DecisionRefused
Decided01 April 2022
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
Two-storey structure consisting of ground floor reception area nd licensed cafe with first floor A/V room, exhibition area and ancillary facilities. The proposal incorporates a passenger lift to link the public road with the Castle Bawn site adjacent to the existing entrance steps at the south east side and a new walkway along south facing slope linking the Castle site from the public road to the Bawn at Dun Na Sead Castle, Baltimore, Co. Cork. The structure is within the curtilage of Dun Na Sead Castle which is a protectesd Structure Ref RPS 00809 and National Monument Ref No. C0150-036003 and C0150-036002

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Dun na Sead Castle Baltimore Co. Cork?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →