GrantedDecided 17 August 2023Cork County Council

Caherlusky Schull Co. Cork

Planning application 23/340
DecisionConditional grant
Decided17 August 2023
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
Development will consist of alterations and extension to existing dwelling to incorporate existing garage. Proposed works include: demolition of existing single storey extension to be replaced with new 1.5 storey extension; demolition of existing conservatory to be replaced with single storey structure with first floor patio area overhead; new roof structure over existing main building, alterations and conversion of garage to form part of the dwelling; decommissioning of existing septic tank and installation of waste water treatment unit and soil polishing filter and associated site development works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Caherlusky Schull Co. Cork?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →