GrantedDecided 21 January 2026Cork County Council

Bishop's-Island Watergrasshill Co Cork

Planning application 24/6355
DecisionConditional permission
Decided21 January 2026
Application typePermission
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
Permission for the construction of a new residential development. The proposed development consists of the demolition of the existing single storey structure on the site and the construction of 15 no. dwelling units, which will comprise of 2 storey, 3-bedroom terraced dwelling units. A new vehicular entrance and boundary wall will be formed on the south eastern boundary of the site onto the R639. The development will include landscaping works, boundary treatments, open green spaces, public lighting, external bin stores, bicycle parking and all ancillary site development works.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Bishop's-Island Watergrasshill Co Cork?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →