GrantedDecided 18 August 2025Cork County Council

Froe Rosscarbery Co. Cork

Planning application 25/193
DecisionConditional permission
Decided18 August 2025
Application typePermission for Retention
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Cork County Council.
Permission sought for a single storey extension to front of existing dwelling including changing existing window to doorway and reduce and alter extent of glazing to existing sunroom. Permission for retention also sought for 1) Velux rooflights to attic storage of dwelling 2) A detached ancillary dwelling (change of use of a domestic garage permitted under Pl. Reg. No. 09/861) including the addition of a first floor and domestic storage areas to the side and rear and 3) A vehicular entrance to the property (change of location to that as permitted under Pl. Reg. No. 09/861

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Cork has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Froe Rosscarbery Co. Cork?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →