GrantedDecided 31 August 2018Donegal County Council

COTTAGE, NEWTOWNCUNNINGHAM, LIFFORD PO

Planning application 1851085
DecisionConditional grant
Decided31 August 2018
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Donegal County Council.
THE EXISTING HARD STANDING AREA ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND PLANNING PERMISSION CONSISTING OF (A) CONSTRUCTION OF AN EXTENSION TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE EXISTING MAINTENANCE BUILDING FOR STORAGE OF ARTIC TRACTOR UNITS AND ALSO CONTAINING AN OFFICE, WCs, STAFF CANTEEN, STORE WITH FIRST FLOOR ADMIN STORAGE, (B) DECOMMISSIONING OF THE EXISTING SEPTIC TANK AND INSTALLATION OF A NEW SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM WITH PERCOLATION AREA AND (C) ALL ASSOCIATED WORKS AND SITE WORKS INCLUDING EXTERNAL CONCRETE HARD STANDING, CONNECTION TO EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Donegal has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near COTTAGE, NEWTOWNCUNNINGHAM, LIFFORD PO?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →