GrantedDecided 24 October 2019Donegal County Council

COXTOWN, CARRIGANS, CO. DONEGAL

Planning application 1951364
DecisionUnconditional grant
Decided24 October 2019
Application typeEXTENSION OF DURATION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Donegal County Council.
CONSTRUCTION OF AN ANAEROBIC DIGESTER FOR THE PRODUCTION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY AND FERTILISER INVOLVING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PRIMARY AND SECONDARY DIGESTER WITH COLLECTION DOME, A CO-JOINING PUMP, TWO SEPARATE DIGESTATE STORAGE TANKS WITH COLLECTION DOMES AND PUMP ROOMS, AND OTHER STRUCTURES ASSOCIATED WITH THE OPERATION OF AN ANAEROBIC DIGESTER SYSTEM INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING: TWO FEED HOPPERS, PRE PIT, CHP BUILDING,ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION, FLARE AND BIOGAS BOTTLING UNIT. WORKS SHALL INCLUDE THE PROVISION OF A CONCRETE APRON, ALL DRAINAGE AND ALL OTHER ASSOCIATED SITE WORKS

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Donegal has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near COXTOWN, CARRIGANS, CO. DONEGAL?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →