GrantedDecided 16 July 2020Donegal County Council

CUMMIRK RIVER MEENAGOLAN MEENKILCARRY, LETTERBRICK GLASAGH BOG & CROADUN, CO DONEGAL

Planning application 2050518
DecisionConditional grant
Decided16 July 2020
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Donegal County Council.
DEVELOPMENT WILL CONSIST OF PLANTING CIRCA 620 TREES (CONSISTING OF EQUAL MIX OF ALDER, WILLOW, SILVER BIRCH & ROWAN) IN A 5M RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE FROM THE RIVER'S EDGE WITH ERECTION OF 745 M GALVANISED WIRE FENCE WHICH WILL INCLUDE 16 UNIGATES, 8 STILES AND 8 2,000 LITRE WATER STORAGE TANKS (BURIED) AS WELL AS 8 CONCRETE DRINKING TROUGHS AND 7 HYDRAULIC RAM PUMPS ON THE NORTHERN BANK OF THE CUMMIRK RIVER. A NATURA IMPACT ASSESSMENT ACCOMPANIES THIS APPLICATION

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Donegal has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near CUMMIRK RIVER MEENAGOLAN MEENKILCARRY, LETTERBRICK GLASAGH BOG & CROADUN, CO DONEGAL?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →