GrantedDecided 17 November 2022Donegal County Council

AN CHÚIL BHEAG, ROS NEAMHLACH, CONTAE DHÚN NA NGALL

Planning application 2251428
DecisionConditional grant
Decided17 November 2022
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Donegal County Council.
(1) DÉANFAR AN CHISTIN AGUS AN SEOMRA FOLCTHA AON STÓIR AR CHÚL AN TÍ CÓNAITHE A SCARTÁIL (2) DÉANFAR AN TEACH CÓNAITHE A ATHCHÓIRIÚ AGUS CUIRFEAR SÍNEADH AON STÓIR AGUS SINEADH DHÁ STÓR LENA THAOBH AGUS AR CHÚL AN TÍ CÓNAITHE (3) ARDÓFAR BALLAÍ AGUS DÍON AN SCIOBÓIL AGUS DÉANFAR ATHCHÓIRIÚ AIR (4) BAINFEAR AN SEANDHABHACH SHÉARACHAIS AGUS TÓGFAR OIBREACHA SÉARACHAIS AGUS LIMISTÉAR SÍOTHLAITHE (5) CUIRFEAR 46 MÉADAR CEARNACH DE PHAINÉIL GHRÉINE AR NA DÍONTA (6) BUNÓFAR NA HOIBREACHA SUÍMH AGUS TÍRDHREACH UILIG A BHAINEANN LEIS AN FHORBAIRT

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Donegal has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near AN CHÚIL BHEAG, ROS NEAMHLACH, CONTAE DHÚN NA NGALL?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →