GrantedDecided 20 March 2025Donegal County Council

GORTALIA, KILCAR, DONEGAL PO

Planning application 2560117
DecisionConditional grant
Decided20 March 2025
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Donegal County Council.
(1) POSITION OF THE SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM AND PERCOLATION, (2) ALTERATION TO THE FRONT ELEVATION OF THE HOUSE FROM THAT GRANTED UNDER PLANNING REF. NO. 07/21217, (3) REPLACEMENT OF SINGLE WINDOW AT GROUND FLOOR LEVEL TO REPLACE 2 NO. GRANTED UNDER PLANNING REF. NO. 07/21217, (4) REPLACEMENT OF WALL PLATE DORMERS WITH LARGER WINDOWS AND CONTINUOUS DORMER AT FIRST FLOOR LEVEL, (5) EXTERNAL STAIRS AND EXTERNAL DOOR AT FIRST FLOOR LEVEL TO EXISTING GARAGE RETAINED UNDER PLANNING REF. NO. 18/50522 AS ACCESS AND ESCAPE ROUTE FROM ATTIC STORAGE SPACE AND HOME GYM AND (6) ALL ASSOCIATED SITE WORKS

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Donegal has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near GORTALIA, KILCAR, DONEGAL PO?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →