GrantedDecided 26 March 2026Donegal County Council

CREESLOUGH, LETTERKENNY, CO. DONEGAL

Planning application 2561833
DecisionConditional grant
Decided26 March 2026
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Donegal County Council.
(1) DEMOLITION OF EXISTING DWELLING HOUSE, (2) ERECTION OF A NEW BUILDING WITH CONNECTION TO ALL PUBLIC SERVICES WHICH WILL INCORPORATE (A) SHOP, (B) POST OFFICE, (C) OFF-LICENCE, (D) STORE, (E) DELI, (F) TOILETS INCLUDING ACCESSIBLE TOILETS, (G) STAFF WELFARE FACILITIES, (H) FORECOURT, (I) UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS AND PUMPS, (J) EXTERNAL CANOPY, (K) CAR WASH FACILITY, (L) ASSOCIATED SIGNAGE INCLUDING TOTEM SIGNAGE, (M) AN OUTDOOR LAUNDRETTE KIOSK, (N) OUTDOOR FUEL BUNKER STORAGE AND (O) AN ATM AND (3) ALL OTHER ASSOCIATED SITE DEVELOPMENT WORKS

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
PL-501159-DL-26Submitted 14 April 2026 / decided Not recorded
Status not recorded
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Donegal has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near CREESLOUGH, LETTERKENNY, CO. DONEGAL?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →