GrantedDecided 27 April 2021Dublin City Council

58, Annadale Drive, Dublin 9 D09 V4P1

Planning application 2315/21
DecisionGrant permission
Decided27 April 2021
Application typePermission
Source documentsPending

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Dublin City Council.
Permission is sought for the conversion of an existing attic with provision of a dormer to the rear together with 2 no. Velux rooflights to the front and widening of existing front pedestrian access for conversion to vehicular access to an existing two storey terraced dwelling.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Dublin City is in progress.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 58, Annadale Drive, Dublin 9 D09 V4P1?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Source link pending

This application was published at source, but the document inventory has not been bound yet.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →