RefusedDecided 16 June 2020Dublin City Council

4 Cullenswood Park, Ranelagh, Dublin 6 D06 AW90

Planning application 2360/20
DecisionRefuse permission
Decided16 June 2020
Application typePermission
Source documentsPending

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Dublin City Council.
Permission to construct a first floor level rear extension to existing 2-storey dwelling.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
ABP-307452-20Submitted 02 July 2020 / decided 19 October 2020
Status not recordedGRANT PERMISSION
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference ABP-307452-20
    02 July 2020
  2. Appeal decisionGRANT PERMISSION
    19 October 2020
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Dublin City has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 4 Cullenswood Park, Ranelagh, Dublin 6 D06 AW90?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Source link pending

This application was published at source, but the document inventory has not been bound yet.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →