GrantedDecided 12 August 2019Dublin City Council

3290/19: PROTECTED STRUCTURE: The development will consist of the erection of two external banners for a temporary period of three years at the main entrance portico of the G.P.O. on O'Connell Street and the replacement of an existing wall mounted brass plaque (675mm x 240mm) with a new plaque of the same dimensions at the north door entrance on the O'Connell Street facade. The banners and plaque are to identify the GPO WITNESS HISTORY VISITOR CENTRE located in the public exhibition area granted permission per Dublin City Council Reg. Ref. 3677/13. The banners will be suspended between two pairs of columns at the portico, facing toward O'Connell Street. The banners will measure 6.500m high and 2.500m wide, be suspended approximately 4.750 metres clear above ground level, be composed of semi-transparent mesh fabric and supported off stainless steel non-invasive fixings on the stone columns at top and bottom.

G.P.O., Lower O'Connell Street, Dublin 1, D01 F5P2 (The G.P.O. is a Protected Structure)
DecisionGrant permission
Decided12 August 2019
Application typePermission
Source documentsPending

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Dublin City has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near G.P.O., Lower O'Connell Street, Dublin 1, D01 F5P2 (The G.P.O. is a Protected Structure)?

Get the precedent report for this site: every grant and refusal within 5 km, and the planners' reasons. €49 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Source link pending

This application was published at source, but the document inventory has not been bound yet.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Full reasons for every nearby decision are in the site report →