RefusedDecided 20 May 2022Dublin City Council

3 Mount Prospect Park, Clontarf, Dublin 3.

Planning application 3618/22
DecisionRefuse retention permissi
Decided20 May 2022
Application typeRetention Permission
Source documentsPending

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Dublin City Council.
RETENTION: Retention Permission for the Retention and Completion of existing Vehicular access. Works included Widening the existing pedestrian access to form Vehicular Access onto Mount Prospect Park along with associated Site Works at No.03 Mount Prospect Park, Clontarf, Dublin 3.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Dublin City is in progress.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 3 Mount Prospect Park, Clontarf, Dublin 3.?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Source link pending

This application was published at source, but the document inventory has not been bound yet.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →