RefusedDecided 10 October 2022Dublin City Council

Clery's, 18-27, O'Connell Street Lower, Dublin 1

Planning application 4669/22
DecisionRefuse permission
Decided10 October 2022
Application typePermission
Source documentsPending

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Dublin City Council.
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: The development will consist of, 1no. new external fascia mounted logo, Individual steel letters powder coated RAL 7021, rear illuminated (static) H&M logo sign located at ground floor level on the existing stone fascia using minimal fixings, mounted centrally above entrance (Size- 300mm high letters x 450mm width, 30mm spacing from fascia, 4,715mm from finished floor).

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Dublin City has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Clery's, 18-27, O'Connell Street Lower, Dublin 1?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Source link pending

This application was published at source, but the document inventory has not been bound yet.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →