GrantedDecided 20 May 2003Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council

Unit 5, Arkle Road, Sandyford Industrial Estate, Dublin 18.

Planning application D03A/0075
DecisionGrant permission for retention
Decided20 May 2003
Application typePermission for Retention
Source documentsPending

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council.
Retention of change of use from showrooms and storage areas

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
PL06D.203285Submitted 13 June 2003 / decided 16 October 2003
Status not recordedTO AMEND CONDITION(S)
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference PL06D.203285
    13 June 2003
  2. Appeal decisionTO AMEND CONDITION(S)
    16 October 2003
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

The council's written reasons and source documents for this decision

No password. We email you a link that opens this page with the reasons showing.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Source link pending

This application was published at source, but the document inventory has not been bound yet.

Buying near Unit 5, Arkle Road, Sandyford Industrial Estate, Dublin 18.?

Buying this site? The €39 site brief covers zoning, flood and heritage layers, nearby refusals and appeals.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →