GrantedDecided 15 January 2008Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council

11, Prospect Lawn, Dublin 18

Planning application D07B/0500
DecisionGrant permission
Decided15 January 2008
Application typePermission
Source documentsPending

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council.
Extension and remodelling of the existing house to include a split level two sto

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
06D.LV.2821Submitted 11 February 2008 / decided 10 March 2008
Status not recordedREFUSE LEAVE TO APPEAL
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference 06D.LV.2821
    11 February 2008
  2. Appeal decisionREFUSE LEAVE TO APPEAL
    10 March 2008
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

No refusal reason is on record for this application yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 11, Prospect Lawn, Dublin 18?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Source link pending

This application was published at source, but the document inventory has not been bound yet.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →