GrantedDecided 05 February 2009Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council

16, Mount Anville Wood, Lower Kilmacud Road, Dublin 14

Planning application D08A/1330
DecisionGrant permission
Decided05 February 2009
Application typePermission
Source documentsPending

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council.
Retention and completion for a wider vehicular access to front.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
PL06D.232935Submitted 03 March 2009 / decided 24 July 2009
Status not recordedTO ATTACH CONDITION(S)
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference PL06D.232935
    03 March 2009
  2. Appeal decisionTO ATTACH CONDITION(S)
    24 July 2009
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

The council's written reasons and source documents for this decision

No password. We email you a link that opens this page with the reasons showing.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Source link pending

This application was published at source, but the document inventory has not been bound yet.

Buying near 16, Mount Anville Wood, Lower Kilmacud Road, Dublin 14?

Buying this site? The €39 site brief covers zoning, flood and heritage layers, nearby refusals and appeals.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →