GrantedDecided 17 June 2008Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council

23, Trimleston Avenue, Bootestown, Co. Dublin

Planning application D08B/0310
DecisionGrant permission
Decided17 June 2008
Application typePermission
Source documentsPending

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council.
Demolition of the existing garage and first floor accommodation to the side, and

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
PL06D.230007Submitted 14 July 2008 / decided 02 February 2009
Status not recordedREFUSE PERMISSION
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference PL06D.230007
    14 July 2008
  2. Appeal decisionREFUSE PERMISSION
    02 February 2009
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

No refusal reason is on record for this application yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 23, Trimleston Avenue, Bootestown, Co. Dublin?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Source link pending

This application was published at source, but the document inventory has not been bound yet.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →