RefusedDecided 24 July 2017Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council

The Lodge, Elm Park House, Rathfarnham, Dublin 16

Planning application D17A/0505
DecisionRefuse permission
Decided24 July 2017
Application typePermission
Source documentsPending

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council.
Permission to construct a first-floor extension on the footprint of existing bun

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
PL06D.249064Submitted 15 August 2017 / decided 09 February 2018
Status not recordedREFUSE PERMISSION
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference PL06D.249064
    15 August 2017
  2. Appeal decisionREFUSE PERMISSION
    09 February 2018
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

No refusal reason is on record for this application yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near The Lodge, Elm Park House, Rathfarnham, Dublin 16?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Source link pending

This application was published at source, but the document inventory has not been bound yet.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →