GrantedDecided 24 January 2018Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council

108 Granitefield, Dún Laoghaire, Co Dublin A96 KT98

Planning application D17A/0627
DecisionGrant permission
Decided24 January 2018
Application typePermission
Source documentsPending

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council.
Permission to develop two detached dwellings within the side and rear garden of

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
ABP-300911-18Submitted 13 February 2018 / decided 13 August 2018
Status not recordedREFUSE PERMISSION
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference ABP-300911-18
    13 February 2018
  2. Appeal decisionREFUSE PERMISSION
    13 August 2018
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

The council's written reasons and source documents for this decision

No password. We email you a link that opens this page with the reasons showing.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Source link pending

This application was published at source, but the document inventory has not been bound yet.

Buying near 108 Granitefield, Dún Laoghaire, Co Dublin A96 KT98?

Buying this site? The €39 site brief covers zoning, flood and heritage layers, nearby refusals and appeals.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →