GrantedDecided 17 October 2022Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council

66, Ailesbury Grove, Dundrum, Dublin 16, D16 EK10

Planning application D22A/0556
Get site risk briefNearby records
DecisionGrant permission
Decided17 October 2022
Application typePermission
Source documents3

Site

Setting
urban
Site area
495 ha
Floor area
Not recorded
Units
Not recorded

What is on file

0refusal reasons9conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council.
Permission for development at this site. The development will consit of: (1)

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.
Application ref
D22A/0556
Received
15 July 2022
Decided
17 October 2022
FI requested
Yes
Authority
Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council
Application type
Permission
Outcome
conditional
Source status
Reasons extracted from source documents

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

No refusal reason is on record for this application yet.

Conditions

  • 1Development must be carried out in accordance with lodged plans, particulars, and specifications as amended by FI.Compliance
  • 2Family flat must be occupied by immediate family, maintained as linked to main dwelling, not let/sold separately, and subsumed back if use ceases.Occupancy
  • 3All external finishes, including roof tiles/slates, must harmonise in material, colour, and texture with the existing dwelling.Design Materials
  • 4Surface water must infiltrate locally to a soakaway designed to BRE Digest 365, min 5m from foundations, 3m from boundaries, with no overflow. Alternative SuDS requires Chartered Engineer report.Wastewater Drainage
  • 5Parking/hardstanding changes must use permeable surfacing per GDSDS SuDS recommendations, with measures to prevent runoff entering the public realm.Wastewater Drainage
  • 6Payment of €82.74 for Surface Water Public Infrastructure and Facilities contribution.Development Contribution
  • 7Payment of €1,892.98 for Roads Public Infrastructure and Facilities contribution.Development Contribution
  • 8Payment of €1,227.84 for Community & Parks Public Infrastructure, Facilities and Amenities contribution.Development Contribution
  • 9Development cannot commence without prior written agreement with the Planning Authority regarding payment of development contributions.Development Contribution

Planning a project near 66, Ailesbury Grove, Dundrum, Dublin 16, D16 EK10?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.
Get my site risk brief
Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Inside the decision file

Extracts from the council's own decision documents for this application — 20 pages of searchable text on file.

Included in site brief

3 council documents — in the €39 site risk brief

Unlock for €39 incl. VATOr read every file with Pro
Site brief
Read the full decision filePro members can search and read every indexed page of this file with the AI research assistant — planner's reasoning, conditions, and precedent across 2 documents.
Unlock with ProTry the research assistant

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Included in site brief

3 council documents — in the €39 site risk brief

Unlock for €39 incl. VATOr read every file with Pro
Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →